'Bhavnath Temple Case Study\r'

'GOSAI NILESH H. DIVISION †A SUB: CASE OF BHAVNATH synagogue SUBMITED TO: Dr. D. R. D. Introduction: The encase is all about an increasing irrigation facilities after emancipation nevertheless in that respect was certain problems with the removing location of BHAVNATH TEMPLE which is between the butch and people don’t want to change place of temple with that there are some other issue likewise there. After independence in 1947, the both interchange & state government want overall economic development. In undivided Bombay province a design given to get decameter on river. It cypher 4700 million cu. ft.Water to develop 92000 acre of land, In 3 district. To do that 8 villages are totally submerged and locate at other place. This all require to providing youthful livelihood to people. The reservoir was to have catchments area of 230 sq. miles. The average rainfall was 34”. In this 1 image the F. S. L. , was 592 H. F. L. was 596 and R. L. was 601. D irected irrigable area was 19300 acres and the indirect irrigation precipitate to some 73600acre. It yields 15. 83 lacks revenue per year. Agricultural achievement increase as 30400 tons. It was 147. 74 lacks. This project was richly feasible in the eyes of government.If externalise 1 was accepted than temple was saved by victimisation gates to save from flood. After making 1 proposal government made 2 proposal. In that, if all of three levels rose so that last-ditch capacity raise to 1000 million cu. Ft. in that F. S. L. 595 &H. F. L. 606. By doing this the agricultural production increasing and irrigation facilities nominate to larger areas. But in 2 purpose temple could not be saved but people remained adamant in there demand. IN 1960 state of Bombay bifurcated and now Gujarat PWD department began to mean about reopened the plan again.They find this scheme was near for development. The problem is that what should do to become success of this plan. Objectives: †¢ To build the dam, • To increase agricultural production, • Do ultimate overall development Problems: • Temple get submerged, • Religious sentiments, • immunity by villagers • People get displaced. Constraints: • Location of dam • Religious sentiment can’t be changed. Criteria: • Cost should be minimized • Maximum returns • stripped people affected • Minimum time in implementation Alternatives: • Plan 1 if no plan 2 • Resettlement of affected people • protect around the temple Help from religious leader • Convincing people about benefit • raise the height of temple Suggestion: From all to a higher place alternative we compare it with objectives, problem, and criteria we can suggest that to succeed this scheme government should increasing level of temple by above than flood level with utilise good construction peeler so at last height of temple raised and they saved from flood. By doing so peoples are permit to build dam on river. Contingency plan: If it is not executable to build temple by construction of piller indeed take help from the religious leader. THANK YOU\r\n'