13 Angry Men 05/16/11 By: Sheraud Baiza A Boy is on Trial for world-class degree dispatch. 13 of us jurywomans will go for to ensconce whether or non the son is guilty. We completely survive what is at menace here, so we must make sure entirely of our decisions are hi-fi and fair to everyones liking. I, for one, rely that the boy on visitation is NOT guilty, due to the factors of reasonable doubt that juror 8 has pointed out clearly to us so far. We are all familiar with the old firearms deposition against the boy, even up? He claimed to have attendd the represent go on between the boy and his father, the boy cheering Im going to kill you!, a remains thud, and ran to the door to chance upon the boy running out all within 15 seconds. A reenactmen t by juror 8 proves that it originally took 41 seconds for the man to break down to the door, improver the el tracks are unbearably loud, so it wouldve been out(predicate) to hear everything accurately. In my opinion, the old man just honestly and mistakenly assumed it was the boy since he was the first one he saw running out. Also, reckon th woman who claimed to have seen everything on the other posture of the El tracks? Well, as you know shes myopic, so she wears render for her condition. However, she had them off the night the murder took place, plus it was very Acherontic in her house, so it was impossible for her to accurately see the boy and assume it was him. These facts should prove the boys innocence, and those of you who hes guilty should think real hard about this. For the ones who believe these facts are putrid, you wouldnt be thinking or look that if you were in the boys shoes now would you? learn to reason, we all deserve a second chance.If you want to get a full essay, post it on our website: ! OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment